Last week a student from UPenn took the liberty to write in to the Temple News to express her opinions regarding contraception in our newspaper. The record needs to be set straight about this for one final time so there is no more distortion and misinformation coming from one side in this debate.
The contraceptive mandate in Obama’s health care plan obfuscates liberals, who are quick to think that Catholic institutions MUST provide contraception, regardless of their religious views. This inclination is wrong, based on our Bill of Rights. It is not within the government’s power to force its religiosity onto private entities who are expressing their freedom of religion. Not once has any GOP candidate come out to oppose contraception, and at no point have they ever said states should ban contraception during this campaign. The true issue-at-hand is the ability of religiously-affiliated institutions to provide care that is in line with their morals and beliefs.
Amendment I allows for freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. The Obama administration would be wise to take this fact into consideration before trying to force Catholic institutions to provide services that are not “rights” in any sense of the word. Let’s say the government mandates that birth control (which is very affordable and readily available) be covered in any plan or at any religious institution, regardless of their beliefs and based on a sense of “public health.” At what point will the government stop forcing institutions to do things that are contradictory to their Amendment I-protected beliefs? Should we get free toothbrushes because they are good for “public health?” Obvious answer here is “no.”
This person also came out in support of Planned Parenthood with more misinformation. According to their own services manual online, Planned Parenthood uses 3% of its budget to finance abortions, and performed 329,445 abortions in 2010, all at taxpayer expense.
Since our public tax dollars are used to fund and subsidize abortions, I think it is only natural that people would want to remove all federal dollars from Planned Parenthood. After all, if they have so much money left over to perform abortions, why are they receiving any tax dollars in the first place?
A clear answer to the Planned Parenthood situation is this. If each liberal that complained about zeroing out funding donated just $10 to Planned Parenthood, I am sure they would be more than adequately-funded.
Regardless of their pro-life or pro-choice stances, the GOP candidates do not support public financing of abortions or the usurpation of religious liberty at the hands of an overzealous government, nor should they.
President, Temple College Republicans